Not Cheap, Not Disposable

by Giff on March 16, 2010

disposablerazorsI side with Mark Suster on the need to retire the phrase “fail fast”.* I understand both sides, and the differences are hardly surprising since VCs live at the macro level (company fails) and entrepreneurs are immersed at the micro level (assumption fails). But it’s still a dumb phrase because it gets misinterpreted too easily.

Take this quote from Umair Haque who wrote: “Failure, not features: Next-gen products and services are built to fail, fast and cheap — instead of just offering tons of features.

The quote hits upon good trends of simplification, prioritization, and validation-before-spending, but it is easy for anyone outside of the lean startup circle to get the wrong message. Indeed, Umair’s quote led one venture capitalist to ask whether Web startups were turning into disposable razors: essentially, try something and if it’s not a hit, move on to the next thing.**

I hate this concept of “disposable” ideas. It leads to small thinking and weak tenacity.

This mentality adds fuel to the accusation that too many Web startups are “features” not companies. It can be seductive to outsiders because it makes startups feel like lower risk (“oh, it’s only a few weeks and maybe I’ll make the new Twitter!“), but the reality is that startups are a long, hard, unfunded, unfamous haul. You try to solve a big hairy problem and beat down the roadblocks with a two-by-four, taking your lumps in the process.***

I think that serious lean startup entrepreneurs are trying to do something of substance, not two-week stints coding gimmick apps that could become the flavor of the day. Hopefully this is more of a messaging problem than a substance problem. Yes, we all pivot, but our startups are not about cheap and disposable.  Them’s fighting words.

Notes
* If I had to pick a phrase, it would be “validate early”. and often. and intelligently.
** this feeds into my mixed feelings about the new religion of “landing page” smoke tests
*** not all startups have to solve a problem — they can instead entertain.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • HackerNews
  • FriendFeed
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • Suggest to Techmeme via Twitter
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Digg
  • http://bothsidesofthetable.com msuster

    Thank you. A very well written post. More concise and less inflammatory than my post ;-)

  • http://giffconstable.com giffc

    Thanks Mark. For the record, I didn't find your piece inflammatory at all but then again, I love a good intellectual rumble to stir things up :)

  • cranstone

    Validation is the only way to go. In itself it is a form of failure. The smart guys add a feature at a time in response to the customers request (more like a prospect) and then immediately test that on another prospect. Validation/failure is part of the business. As they say, no plan survives first contact with the enemy, you have to be, as we say, willing to learn and adapt in all aspects of your business.

  • http://www.chriscarella.com/ ccarella

    Timely post. I heard the “fail fast” advice given to a bunch of young entrepreneurs this morning at a startup camp and I cringed. If someone says iterate and fail fast in the same paragraph they may just be playing buzzword bingo.

  • http://twitter.com/nemra nemra

    Agree. “Fail fast” or even “validate fast” can be applied to technologies and features, and it might be a best approach for those cases. But building a product means keeping it alive, making it better and valuable for customers, and it is a long run (Facebooks and Twitters are not built in a day or a year) with critical points, strategy change, model change, etc… Having pre-startup “teams” for validating their ideas is good, while having a startup with its model, team and philosophy is a matter of “go forward and win”.

  • http://www.howlersandyowlers.com/ Amanda

    Being a web-developer, I TOTALLY agree with you, especially on your last quote:
    Isn't it true that most long-lasting startups are entertaining as opposed to problem-solvers, or am I wrong there?

  • http://theotherlane.com/blog/2010/04/05/links-from-march-17th-to-31st/ Links from March 17th to 31st | theotherlane.com Blog

    [...] An argument against the “Fail Fast” mantra [link] [...]